Archive for the 'Restriction of Macro-Choices' Category
Tuesday, June 15th, 2010
Education, Public and Commercial
Diane Ravitch is an honest and thoughtful person. After decades of advocating the official bi-party line on “educational reform,” Ravitch has examined the evidence and concluded that testing, school choice, and “race to the top” are not just bogus, but harmful.
Well, of course. Who in their right mind believes that our overclass actually wants the most educated possible population? Quite the contrary, for the all-too-obvious reason.
In fact, Ravitch herself provides a useful lens for seeing exactly how screwed up our elite schooling is. At age 72, Ravitch, a Wellesley graduate, is just now thinking her way through the very first tuft of weeds stymieing acknowledgment that excessive public knowledge is seen as a grave danger by the primary beneficiaries of our market-totalitarian society. Ravitch now writes like my Sociology 101 students, or like a 6th grader would in a society that actually took these words seriously, rather than as window dressing:
That an Ivy-educated professional school-policy expert is, at the end of her career, just beginning to ponder what this really means speaks volumes about what passes for the top in our educational efforts.
And, despite her bravery in coming out against the status quo and its cynical trickery, Ravitch remains importantly wrong in at least one core area. She complains that the teaching of history and literature are “so frequently politicized.”
Well, once again, duh. They are politicized by structure and design, for the same all-too-obvious reason. The real history of the United States and the world radicalizes most people who learn it. Hence, it is forbidden. The best you get in K-12 is distant hints.
This systemic ban on truth-telling is why my 14-year-old son, presently a student in one of the richest and most liberal-minded of the nation’s public school districts, while studying for his 8th grade social studies final, asked me, thinking I wouldn’t know, “Who founded the NAACP?” When I told him it was W.E. B. DuBois, he said, “Oh, yeah.” When I added that DuBois was a socialist, my son was floored that that fact was absent from his lessons. This, despite the undeniable fact that DuBois himself would have insisted being a socialist was the #1 fact of his own life, the very first thing later people ought to remember about him.
The day we become serious about education (a day that will probably never arrive, given the continuing dictatorial power of our business elite and their ongoing breakneck squandering of the planet’s resources) will be the day we mandate that our spending on schools must always equal or exceed the sums corporate stockholders spend on commercial indoctrination, a.k.a. big business marketing. At present, that latter sum is probably more than $2 trillion a year in the USA alone.
Tuesday, May 4th, 2010
Cato is Clown Central
The mighty journalistic flagship USA Today carries a story about yet another preposterous effort by medical experts to pretend that the people who run the United States are going to consider making the nation’s built environment friendly to exercise. The delusional proposal in question is, in the credulous description of USA Today, a “comprehensive, wide-ranging strategies outlined in the new U.S. National Physical Activity Plan, which is being released today by an expert panel representing influential health organizations. Among groups involved are the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American College of Sports Medicine, the American Heart Association and the American Cancer Society.”
The “comprehensive” plan is, as always, a melange of quarter-measures and rote incantations, none of which, puny as they are, stands a ghost of a chance of getting funded:
• Make sure roadway spending includes money for “complete streets,” accommodating cars, bikes and pedestrians.
• Have doctors assess patients’ physical activity levels at appointments and discuss ways they can meet the activity guidelines.
• Encourage early childhood education programs to have little ones as physically active as possible.
• Provide access to and opportunities for physical activity before and after school.
• Encourage school officials to find ways for children to walk and bike safely to school.
• Provide tax breaks for building owners or employers who provide amenities in workplaces that support active commuting, such as showers in buildings, secure bicycle parking, free bicycles or transit subsidies.
• Increase funding and resources for parks, recreation, fitness and sports programs and facilities in areas of high need.
Of course, for “balance” in its reporting on this piece of hopeless liberal special pleading, USA Today must turn to “conservatives,” who, of course, refuse to admit that any environmental discouragement of health exists in corporate capitalist America.
Cue the blithering clowns of the unintentionally hilarious Cato Institute:
“Most people are overweight not because there isn’t a sidewalk in their neighborhood but because we like to eat and we don’t like to exercise,” says David Boaz, executive vice president of the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington, D.C.
And the price of the changes could be high. “Everything costs something,” Boaz says. “Every action has a cost, and when it’s government-involved, whether it’s federal or local, they are generally less efficient with money. This is the elite planning for how the masses should live.”
Only in America, folks, only in America: Choices exist independently of environments. Government is always less efficient than mega-corporations, no evidence mentioned or required. And, despite the fact that big business marketing is the largest and most sophisticated program of behavioral control in human history and something that receives twice as much funding as all forms and levels of schooling combined, “elite planning for how the masses should live” can only come from the government or their evil dupes and shills, worried public health researchers.
Monday, February 22nd, 2010
Well, Duh
The New York Times today ran this timid little observation:
The president’s new provision seemed to offer Republicans an opening for a new line of criticism — that Obama and Democrats are anticipating the possibility of hefty price increases for health insurance even after their big legislation is adopted.
Gosh, you think so? You think private, for-profit corporate medical insurers might keep raising their prices after it becomes illegal for citizens not to buy their products?
“Seems” rather more than merely “possible,” wouldn’t you think?
Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009
Empires Never Learn
Escalation you can believe in. Obama is a defective product. I give him a 0 out of 100. If last November you’d outlined a script for the worst possible nightmare from his rule, he’d have followed it to the letter.
CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Nov. 13-15, 2009. N=1,014 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3. |
||||||
| “Do you favor or oppose the U.S. war in Afghanistan?” | ||||||
|
. |
||||||
| Favor | Oppose | Unsure |
. |
|||
| % | % | % |
. |
|||
|
11/13-15/09 |
45 | 52 | 3 |
. |
||
|
10/30 – 11/1/09 |
40 | 58 | 2 |
. |
||
|
9/11-13/09 |
39 | 58 | 3 |
. |
||
|
8/28-31/09 |
42 | 57 | 2 |
. |
||
|
7/31 – 8/3/09 |
41 | 54 | 5 | |||
Monday, November 16th, 2009
The Radical Truth About Energy
Nathan Lewis of Cal Tech says we’d need 10,000 plutonium (not uranium) reactors to produce 80 percent of existing energy consumption. To do that, we’d need to build a new plutonium plant every other day for the next 50 years, without any interruptions.
Conservation is coming and coming hard, my friends. The only question is whether we’ll retain any say in the adjustment process. Our current rulers, Obama distinctly included, don’t want us to gain the first glimmer of
awareness of the basic facts.
Saturday, November 14th, 2009
Ghostwritten Politics
Supposedly, it’s just way too crude to say that the state is the executive committee of the ruling class, that politics is the shadow business casts on society.
Meanwhile:
WASHINGTON — In the official record of the historic House debate on overhauling health care, the speeches of many lawmakers echo with similarities. Often, that was no accident.
Statements by more than a dozen lawmakers were ghostwritten, in whole or in part, by Washington lobbyists working for Genentech, one of the world’s largest biotechnology companies.
E-mail messages obtained by The New York Times show that the lobbyists drafted one statement for Democrats and another for Republicans.
The lobbyists, employed by Genentech and by two Washington law firms, were remarkably successful in getting the statements printed in the Congressional Record under the names of different members of Congress.
Genentech, a subsidiary of the Swiss drug giant Roche, estimates that 42 House members picked up some of its talking points — 22 Republicans and 20 Democrats.
Source: The New York Times, November 14, 2009
