I was too dismissive in that last post, as readers have said.  John Michael Greer remains a highly astute and valuable analyst of ecology, as well as a source of good advice about how to plan for your personal adaptation to likely future events.

As a student of politics and society, I believe he has much work to do, and I would suggest that it is wise to take what he says about the social dimension of existing societies with extreme caution.

I also think it’s interesting that Greer thinks his theory that no power elite exists in the United States is a source of hope.  The obvious follow-up question is what makes him think Americans will ever choose anything different, if everything we have has been freely and co-equally chosen all along?  Cultures don’t make spontaneous leaps.

Personally, I think it’s not only simple realism to observe that we have been massively dominated by institutions owned by our elite, but the existence of this domination offers far more hope than does Greer’s mainstream consensus view of our history.  Power structures and political policies are a lot easier to change than the way everybody thinks about the world (whatever that is).

Please Login to comment
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
justin Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of

Do yourself a favor, skip part III.


And a followup, I left a rather mild criticism that has been withheld while scores of other laudatory comments have been approved. (To be fair to JMG, here is my comment. I saved it in word after your remark about being censored. I produce this because I think it is fair to not just rely on my characterization of the comment. I still think the guy does a lot of important stuff in giving practical advice, but I am a little blown away at the unwillingness to even engage a slight critique. He’s had a lifetime experience fighting against the… Read more »