Inequality in the US only ever fell once. It was World War Two and its socialist economy.
Riot Grrlzz are not afraid to sell out, as proven by the case of Carrie Brownstein, who continues to get even more over-rated than ever, despite starting out with a blatant knock-off of one album wonder Patti Smith. The latest recipients of a Golden Hicksie:
Politics in the United States is marketing. Nothing more, nothing less.
So, here comes Killary, as reported by The Washington Post:
Is Hillary Rodham Clinton a McDonald’s Big Mac or a Chipotle burrito bowl? A can of Bud or a bottle of Blue Moon? JCPenney or J. Crew? As she readies her second presidential campaign, Clinton has recruited consumer marketing specialists onto her team of trusted political advisers. Their job is to help imagine Hillary 5.0 — the rebranding of a first lady turned senator turned failed presidential candidate turned secretary of state turned likely 2016 Democratic presidential nominee. Clinton and her image-makers are sketching ways to refresh the well-established brand for tomorrow’s marketplace. In their mission to present voters with a winning picture of the likely candidate, no detail is too big or too small — from her economic opportunity agenda to the design of the “H” in her future campaign logo.
“It’s exactly the same as selling an iPhone or a soft drink or a cereal,” said Peter Sealey, a longtime corporate marketing strategist.
As always, spending will reach new heights, and choices and democratic responsiveness will be even closer to zero.
It’s going to be a long winter, friends.
As “content marketing” devours the talent and space that once was journalism, its architects include the likes of Sarah Mandato (what a name for an overclass mind-molder!), “director of content solutions at Nativo, a native advertising company.” As shown at Advertising Age, here is how our dear pixie-bot thinks and talks, as she labors to get her victims to “consume” her tricks on her clients’ sites, as “brand content served within publisher editorial streams, matched to the look and feel of each publication”:
How can brands ensure they’re optimizing content?
Optimization opportunities are similar to having a focus group providing real-time feedback about what does and doesn’t appeal to readers. With today’s robust ad tech ecosystem, marketers have expanded tools to apply A/B tests and optimizations on campaigns. It’s no different with content — marketers can test their branded content’s various components, such as headlines and images. By not taking advantage of this, brands are turning down the chance to listen to consumers and gain actionable insights around messaging that best resonates with users.
Yes, “listen to.” That’s “listen to” in the mode of BB and Winston Smith, of course.
Lovely stuff, isn’t it?
But, of course:
“The most expensive midterm campaign in American history stumbled into Election Day on Tuesday with voters’ interest at record lows…
“[C]andidates in both parties have done little to inspire the electorate.
“For all the money and nail-biting races this year, the outcome is not likely to result in a drastic change of policy.”
[The New York Times]
What a personage. TCT happened to see her show tonight during her usual phony “concerned” bipartisan posing. While asking some goon about the continuing death of journalism, she asked “How will this affect consumers of news?”
“Consumers of news.” Nuff (or Ruff) said. Stay tuned for Antiques Road Show, voiceover provided by “intellectual” actor Paul Giamatti.